Watch the Koh confirmation hearing
Leave a CommentClick here and click on the “live broadcast” link.
Click here and click on the “live broadcast” link.
The justices on the U.S. Supreme Court were not the only ones who weighed the merits of Ricci v. DeStefano today. So did the editorial boards of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
And just as the justices appeared divided on the firefighters’ discrimination claims, the newspapers diverged, too, taking opposite positions.
The Times urged the court to side with the city, saying, “Because New Haven had a reasonable belief that the test discriminated against minority applicants, it had a legitimate basis for discarding the results.”
The Journal, on the other hand, took the firefighters’ side, noting that while diversity is a noble goal “there’s got to be a better way to accomplish this goal than by denying promotions to workers who earned them under a well understood process open to all candidates.”
The United States Supreme Court heard 70 minutes of oral arguments this morning in the Ricci v. DeStefano case, which was brought by one Hispanic and 19 white New Haven firefighters against the city. The firefighters are claiming the city discriminated against them because it threw out a promotional exam on which black firefighters scored poorly.
The Court appeared divided over the firefighters’ claim, according to The Associated Press. Full story after the jump.