On July 12, 2018, the three of us filed complaints with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO), alleging sex discrimination against Yale University and several fraternities at Yale. The problems that compelled us are numerous and include the sexually hostile environments at fraternities and lack of accountability both brothers and partygoers face for sexual harassment and assault; the stranglehold fraternities have on the party scene; and the systematic exclusion of women and nonbinary people from the ranks of fraternities, which subsequently denies them the vast social benefits and economic opportunities brothers may accrue solely by virtue of their maleness.

We have experienced this unlawful discrimination firsthand. We are members of Engender, a registered student organization that advocates for equity and inclusion at Yale. During the last two academic years, Engender members sought admission to nine of Yale’s all-male fraternities. All but one fraternity refused to let our members rush, and the one that did ultimately denied our members’ requests for admission. We have also experienced, witnessed and know of numerous instances of sexual harassment and assault at Yale’s all-male fraternities.

Prospective and new students wouldn’t know any of this if they took Yale at its word. Publicly, Yale promises its students an environment free from discrimination –– especially on the basis of sex. The University declares its commitment to equal opportunity and mutual respect. Yale’s regulations state that all student organizations — whether registered or unregistered — must follow the university’s anti-discrimination policy.

Yet, under scrutiny, these promises don’t hold water. Last year, members of Engender met with various Yale administrators to discuss both Yale’s relationship to its Greek life and what path we might take within the College to address the discrimination and sexual misconduct that we experienced at the hands of fraternities. Deans Chun, Howard, Lizarribar and Peeples made light of the fact that fraternities denied Engender members’ requests for admission. Even though they agreed that we had experienced discrimination, they informed us that Yale would not support our efforts to challenge the fraternity system.

To be clear: Though Yale has the power to do something, they choose to do nothing. Other universities have made significant strides toward reigning in single-gender organizations. Harvard, for example, banned exclusionary single-sex organizations and barred members from campus leadership positions unless their organizations committed to integration. Many organizations took the chance to integrate after Harvard’s decision. By contrast, Yale administrators have voiced fears of lawsuits if they were to adopt Harvard’s approach, a risk we believe Yale should be willing to take to end overt gender discrimination against its female and nonbinary students.

Many attempt to explain away fraternities’ bad reputations by placing the blame on a few individuals. At Yale in particular, we have heard students say that only some fraternities are “bad,” not all. It’s time we recognize that Greek organizations are structurally flawed, that any social organization that, in 2018, would deny an applicant on the basis of gender is gravely outdated and is sexist at its core. It is true that some Yale fraternities have had horrendous sexual assault and harassment scandals while others have not. But all of Yale’s fraternities entertain a coed population at parties conceived of and run by all-male leadership. At its best, this phenomenon promotes male supremacy and sexual harassment, stigmatizes and alienates queer students and excludes nonbinary identity altogether. At its worst, this phenomenon has not only proven seriously dangerous for current Yale students but inculcates norms of sexual violence in men who will go on to fill positions in the most lucrative industries and influential offices.

Yale’s inaction so far cannot be attributed to anything other than deliberate indifference. Even as our university celebrates 50 years of undergraduate coeducation, it turns a blind eye to the indignities women and other marginalized students face with staggering frequency. We filed our complaints with the CHRO to challenge the assumed legitimacy of a system which disenfranchises us personally, subjects us to pervasive sexual harassment and assault and undermines the promise of equal opportunity on this campus. Yale College opened its gates to women nearly 50 years ago. It’s time to protect the students inside.

Anna Mcneil is a junior in Branford College, Ellie Singer is a sophomore in Benjamin Franklin College and Ry Walker is a junior in Saybrook College. They are co-directors of Engender, an organization advocating for equity and inclusion in social spaces at Yale. Contact them at engenderequality@gmail.com .

  • Ferto

    This is the equivalent of asking the high school principal to break up the cool kid table because they wouldn’t let you sit with them.

    Fraternities are made up of tight-knit friend groups, they’re not afterschool extracurricular clubs. You can’t force someone to include you in their social group any more than you can force someone to allow you to hang out in their suite.

    Just make your own coed social group, Fence is an excellent example. You might not have the same social and economic benefits of established brotherhoods full of generations of alumni, but then again, why do you feel that it is a right of yours to have access to such benefits? Do many Yalies demand equality when their peers benefit from rich friends’ companionship, affording them lavish nights out and professional opportunities (e.g. the father of a roommate getting a fellow Yalie a cushy banking job thanks to personal association?) While unfair, you have no right to associate with anyone and to reap the benefits of such an association.

    I’ve yet to be convinced otherwise that the only people who agree with Engender are Engender.

  • ShadrachSmith

    The Kavanaugh hearings may have exhausted my tolerance for such stuff. Best of luck, but No, you can’t destroy anybody you want to with a mere accusation. That’s a power you use corruptly. And it’s disgusting. No offense intended, you’ve just been caught up in a political power grab…I don’t blame you, I treasure you.

  • Peter

    They have a “stranglehold” on party life only because everyone else is lame. IF you don’t like their parties, (a) don’t go, and (b) throw your own parties. The Feb Club started because some Yalies were bored one winter. Start your own “fraternal” organization that is open to all, regardless of gender or gender identity. Skull & Bones got going because the founders weren’t invited to the cool kids club, i.e., Phi Beta Kappa, so they started their own club. The university has been trying to kill the frats since the 1930’s. They were pretty much all dead by 1980. If Yalies since about 1990 have rebuilt them, you, too, can build your own club, and buy your own clubhouse. (When the established societies wouldn’t let Jews in, the Jews built their own clubhouse on Hillhouse.)

  • Man with Axe

    It’s quixotic to want to force entry into social groups that don’t want to include you. What is the benefit to you except to make a political point?

  • Nad Navlis

    I feel terrible that you were forced to attend these social functions and then forcefully prevented from leaving them when you saw what was going on. You were forced and prevented, weren’t you? Otherwise you would have no basis for a lawsuit. I thought you had to be smart to get into Yale. I guess in this case I was wrong.