Students host sex forum

In the wake of last week’s now-infamous “Preseason Scouting Report” e-mail, a collection of student groups gathered over the weekend to discuss sexuality at Yale.

A Sunday forum titled “A Conversation about Sex at Yale” brought together more than 80 students and faculty in response to the “Scouting Report,” an anonymous, widely circulated e-mail ranking the physical attractiveness of 53 women in the class of 2013. Volunteers from student organizations including the Women’s Center, women’s athletics teams, sororities and cultural houses led small, informal discussion groups in rooms throughout William L. Harkness Hall, addressing topics such as Yale’s so-called “hookup culture.”

“Of course we think strong action should be taken against whoever wrote the e-mail, but what we can do right now is start a broad conversation in the community about sex at Yale,” said Women’s Center business coordinator Blair Lanier ’11.

Women’s Center coordinators employed the discussion format to encourage participants to speak openly about the sensitive topics, Women’s Center board member Dounia Bredes ’11 said. (Bredes is a staff photographer for the News.)

The community forum stood in contrast to the Center’s aggressive response to the “Yale sluts” controversy of early 2008, when 12 students affiliated with the fraternity Zeta Psi were photographed outside the Center holding a sign that read “We Love Yale Sluts.” That year, the Center threatened legal action before demanding policy changes from the University administration in response to the incident.

About 25 students volunteered to moderate the Sunday discussion groups, split by gender into four groups of men and 10 groups of women, Lanier said. Rhiana Gunn-Wright ’11, the Center’s constituency coordinator, said the decision to divide by gender was made to create a safe environment for participants. The groups worked off a set of suggested questions prepared by the Women’s Center. In one discussion group, the conversation turned to the topic of how relationships develop on campus.

“If relationships start as a hookup, or sex, or something much more physically intimate, is that right?” said moderator Amy Larsen ’10, a freshman counselor in Calhoun College. “Is that healthy for men and women? Is that just ‘the way it is’?”

Before the attendees broke into groups, Women’s Center organizers addressed the crowd, acknowledging the e-mail’s impact.

“We hope you know that the ‘Preseason Scouting Report’ was not indicative of the attitudes of most men here,” Gunn-Wright said. “This event was created in response to the ‘Preseason Scouting Report,’ but that will not be the primary focus of the event.”

Although Yale administrators were not directly involved in organizing Sunday’s forum, several administrators spoke briefly during the event, including Amy Baccus, senior associate athletic director, and Maria Trumpler, director of the office of LGBTQ resources. In a nod to Yale College Dean Mary Miller, who did not attend the event, Trumpler said the forum had Miller’s full support.

Miller declined to comment on the ongoing investigation into the e-mail’s origins, though she published an op-ed in today’s News addressing the e-mail.

Participants said the discussions were productive, but several questioned whether the forum would benefit the rest of the Yale community, given its limited audience. The event was publicized on flyers posted throughout campus and through e-mails to different student organizations and freshman counselors, as well as through word of mouth.

“This is a self-selecting group,” said Women’s Center outreach coordinator Emma Barash ’11. “But when we have this conversation, it reminds people who are too nervous or too busy … to be a part of this conversation.”

The Women’s Center will host a follow-up event within the next two weeks, Lanier said.


  • camille

    I understand the need for safer space, but adhering to the gender binary doesn’t allow for that for everyone. The Women’s Center’s general refusal to move beyond that binary was one of the main reasons I never felt compelled to get too involved there. I’ve been involved in plently of caucuses, discussions, and collectives that organize based on gender but outside of the binary to create safer spaces to talk & work that are actually inclusive.


    Without condoning the crudeness and displays of sexual crassness that have become common at Yale, I have to wonder if the Yale Women’s Center doesn’t share responsibility for the sexual environment of Yale.

    If you’re going to promote a hookup culture, like the YWC does, you’re going to have people discussing it openly, frankly, and crudely. If you want to normalize an environment in which there are no social pressures on women, you will see an environment in which the social pressures on men – that would normally prevent them from being asses – are similarly stripped away.

    It seems to me like the YWC wants to have its cake and eat it too.

  • supersenior

    Look, ROLFCOPTER, where do you get this totally inaccurate idea that the WC promotes Hook-Up culture? Most of the WC members I know don’t believe in sex outside serious relationships, one of them doesn’t believe in sex outside marriage, and every talk I’ve been to ar the WC about college life has identified hook-up culture as a serious problem. Isn’t this why Blair and Emily’s letter to the YDN said we had to put the email in the context of sexual culture at Yale i.e. that harrassment does indeed directly stem from this sordid attitude. That’s also what was discussed at the talk – but if you’d bothered to come and engage, you’d know that.

  • Paideexella

    Hi Everyone,

    I just wanted to share this FDA warning about Reglan.

    Since there is presently no known permanent cure for serious gastrointestinal distress, it
    is not surprising that many patients seek out treatments to provide long-term relief.

    According to package insert dosage instructions, Reglan was only intended to be taken
    for up to three months. People who have taken this drug for longer than the three–month
    prescribed period have sometimes developed a seriously debilitating condition known as
    tardive dyskinesia.

    Recently, the FDA has issued a public health warning to both patients
    and physicians with the intention of avoiding additional instances of this devastating disorder.
    No treatment is currently available to treat tardive dyskinesia symptoms. Many of these side
    effects are irreversible and permanent.

    For more information on Reglan and a list of tardive dyskinesia symptoms check out the
    Reglan Safety Site.