Wikimedia Commons

Could wood buildings save the climate? New research from Yale indicates that the use of engineered wood in urban construction could help cities absorb excess carbon from the environment.

This collaborative study from Yale’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, the School of Architecture and colleagues from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany modeled the effects of building materials on carbon emissions and storage. They found that timber products have the potential to turn our buildings into carbon sinks.

“Natural carbon sinks such as land ecosystems and oceans have been able to offset anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide for decades, but scientists were never sure how long this absorption capacity [would] persist because of a changing climate,” said Galina Churkina, Potsdam Institute researcher and the study’s co-author. “So, [we] started looking for other options to store carbon on land.”

The study’s findings show how wood buildings can function as carbon sinks, where the material removes carbon from the air and stores it, thus helping to offset the excess carbon produced in urban areas. According to Potsdam Institute researcher and co-author Christopher Reyer, since the world’s population is increasing, climate change mitigation efforts will be challenged by people’s need for shelter.

“For cities and urban areas we already know that climate-friendly building will be important,” Reyer said. “If the buildings can be an additional carbon sink, they are part of a bunch of larger scale solutions that [reduce] emissions.”

It is estimated that by 2050 the development of new infrastructure for the world’s growing population will consume 30 to 65 percent of the remaining carbon budget allotted to keep the global temperature increase to 2. The researchers forecasted how a switch from traditional building materials, such as steel and concrete, to engineered wood would reduce the global emissions produced during the manufacturing process as well as the carbon storage potential of each. Depending on the level of commitment to this building approach, cities could increase their carbon storage by 25 to 170 percent, it said, which will help climate change mitigation by 2050.

Co-author Barbara Reck, a senior researcher at the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, explained building with engineered wood will not increase the level of fire risk when compared to other materials.

“This cross laminated timber has a critical mass that makes it char on the outside while retaining a cold core,” Reck said. “You will not have a sudden structural failure that you might have with steel, when exposed steel beams may melt and possibly collapse.”

Reck also pointed out that building with engineered mass timber products will be faster and cheaper since parts are prefabricated. Switching to timber products, however, will require careful protection of forests.

“[The new system] needs a tight coupling of sustainable forest management and sustainable governance that sets the rules, criteria and indicators to support increased building with timber,” Reyer said. “It is important to note that our analyses exclude protected areas as a source of wood, yet to fully implement our proposal, more work is needed to understand and quantify the risks to global forests.”

Phil Dube FES ’20 feels that engineered timber could be “a real alternative” to traditional materials but points out that more research is needed on what happens to the materials at the end of a building’s life cycle. As far as the lasting implications of the study’s findings, Alan Organschi, faculty at the Yale School of Architecture and co-author in this study, said there is a lot to look forward to.

“If we can gain both the downstream public health and upstream environmental health [effects], be really careful about how we treat the forest as we do it … and optimize the potential health benefits of using a natural material that at the end of its life can be potentially reused for other buildings,” Organschi said. “Then I think there’s some real promise with these new technologies.”

Currently, the building and construction industries are responsible for about half of all steel demand globally.

Savannah Kucera | savannah.kucera@yale.edu

  • http://www.globe-net.com/ Frank Came

    The research upon which this article is based is seriously flawed. It fails to consider full lifecycle assessment of building material, in particular of wood used for mass timber structures. It also ignores the simple fact that only a fraction of the carbon sequestered in a living tree ends up in long-lasting wood products, the rest being lost in harvesting and product manufacturing. Destroying our forests – the lungs of the planet – to build wooden towers is a nonsensical approach for dealing with climate change. See: http://bit.ly/32MTvWu