Private student loans nixed

Starting next academic year, Yale will switch from relying on private lenders in favor of a federally funded student loans program, Yale Director of Student Financial Services Caesar Storlazzi said Tuesday.

While Yale previously resisted adopting the government’s Direct Loans program, the University announced it will make the switch even before it becomes mandatory with the passage of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, expected as early as December.

Yale initially listed compromised service and higher fees among its concerns with the Direct Loans program, but the changes will not affect student loan availability or eligibility, Storlazzi said.

Yale currently uses the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program, through which students receive federally subsidized loans from private banks. The new law would replace FFEL with the Direct Loans program, which lends federal funds directly to students and their families. Yale will make the switch in advance of the legislation’s likely passage because Storlazzi’s office must install new software and adopt new administrative procedures in preparation for Direct Loans, Storlazzi said. Under the new program, Yale will be held responsible for overseeing the distribution of federal student loans — a job that was done by private lenders under FFEL, he said — and also for restructuring the Financial Aid Office.

“The writing is on the wall, and we want to make sure that there is a smooth transition to the Direct Loans program when it passes,” Storlazzi said.

Discussion over plans to adopt the Direct Loans program has been on the agenda for more than two years, Storlazzi said. But Yale has been reluctant to assent to government requests that the University adopt the program (just last month, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan sent a letter to 3,000 colleges urging them to do so) because private lenders traditionally provided better service and borrower benefits such as lower interest rates, Storlazzi said. FFEL loan providers likewise have expressed concerns about the loss of innovation and default counseling services generated by competition among multiple private lenders.

Other benefits provided by private lenders included reduced interest rates during repayment for on-time payments, up-front fee reductions and better mortgage rates for consistent on-time payments, Storlazzi said.

But he noted that due to the economic crisis, such borrower benefits have disappeared, making FFEL and direct loans very similar.

Storlazzi pointed to Bank of America’s decision two weeks ago to pull out of the FFEL program and Congress’s refusal to renew the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loan Act (ECASLA), which ensured the continued availability of federal funds to private lenders through the economic crisis, as evidence that a switch to the Direct Loans program is all but inevitable.

According to data from the Yale Financial Aid Office, 399 Yale undergraduates currently hold Stafford Loans, the student loans subsidized or funded by the federal government, whose funding source will switch from private lenders to the federal government once the Direct Loans legislation passes. Storlazzi said he expects these students will barely notice the switch.

“Only the source of funding for student loans has changed,” he said. “Application procedures, eligibility and loan regulations will remain the same.”

Yale students who take Yale Student Loans or alternative loans provided by banks but not subsidized by the government — the two other lending options allowed by the Financial Aid Office — are not affected by the changes, and parents using the Federal PLUS loan, which helps parents pay their contribution, will see their interest rate drop to 7.9 percent from 8.5 percent, Storlazzi added.

Kevin Bruns, executive director of America’s Student Loans Providers, an organization that represents FFEL lenders, said competition among private lenders created incentives for lenders to develop new services geared toward increasing customer satisfaction. Among the innovations were the creation of an electronic signature tool that allowed students to complete their loan applications online.

Counseling services that help students who are about to default on their loan repayments will also disappear once the Direct Loans legislation is passed, said Richard Croce, senior vice-president and general counsel of Connecticut Student Loan Providers, an agency that guarantees FFEL loans.

Still, Zakiya Smith, policy advisor in the Office of the Under Secretary of Education, said concerns over compromised service are unwarranted. Under the direct loans program, the government outsources its lending to four private companies — Sallie Mae, American Education Services/Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, Great Lakes Education Loan Services, Inc. and Nelnet, Inc. — whose contract renewals will take into account the level of customer satisfaction and default prevention, Smith said.

Still, Yale’s decision to switch to the Direct Loans program will mean the University will now face added administrative burdens, said Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a Web site that offers financial aid information and advice to college-bound students.

Yale students holding Stafford Loans will be notified of the changes to the source of their funding by the Financial Aid Office beginning January of next year. An updated version of Yale’s financial aid application will also be made available that month.

Once legislation on Direct Loans is passed, universities will be required to convert their loans by July 1, 2010.

Comments

  • Recent Alum

    You have to credit Yale for doing its part for making our already gigantic federal government even bigger. Whatever you may say about the decision, you can’t accuse Yale of not practicing what it preaches…

  • Tanner

    Why does Yale bother having a School of Managment since the rest of the University see’s their future endowment source from Washington’s rubber checks, that and looking to be China’s favorite student exchange partner.

    Hey future doctors can just pay off their loans when Physicians become CIvil Servents.

  • Dagny

    Atlas Shrugged, anyone?

  • direct loans fan

    Direct loans has been excellent for my med school loans. Great website, responsive and suprisingly competent people answering my emails. There are rewards for on-time payments. Also you can apply for deferment/forbearance for economic hardship. Things have run smoothly. The anxiey adn anti-all-things fed govt attitude isnt really rooted in facts in this case as far as I can tell.

  • Opponents, please explain

    Could one of the conservatives who’s complaining about this – maybe you, Recent Alum – please tell me why it’s more efficient for the federal government to guarantee student loans and let private companies issue them, rather than just cutting out the middleman and issuing the loans itself? Direct loans make a lot more sense, and every study that’s ever been done since the direct loan program has been in existence shows that it’s both better for students (i.e. can offer lower interest rates) and less costly to the government than the guaranteed-loan alternative.

    Plus each school typically has only one provider, so it’s not like you have the competition of the private marketplace at work in the guaranteed-loan program. The only decision-makers are school loan officers, who don’t have a lot of specialized knowledge and have often abused their position to get lavish perks from loan companies.

    Seriously, someone tell me why the guaranteed-loan private program is better or why this is a bad decision. I’m dying to hear a coherent argument on this instead of just the usual “government BAD!” slogans. Will one of the conservatives on this board please stand up?

  • Yale 08

    @#4,

    You don’t get it. We, the taxpayers, are subsidizing your student loans.

    Government loans programs don’t work like real loans from banks. The government is constrained by “risk” or “capital reserves”. The government just borrows and lends more (or inflates the currency).

  • @ yale 08

    thanks for the non sequitor. i’ll just restate my point that from teh perspective of a borrower the direct loans servicing program is quite good.

    if you have a problem with taxpayers subsidizing a small portion of the interest of my 160K in med school loans, then take it to your congressman or your favorite talking head. just remember taht your daddy doesn’t pay everyone’s tuition bills, just yours.

    thansk, #4

  • Ignatius

    I found the title of this article misleading in the current student aid environment. Private loans and FFELP loans are two separate things. FFELP loans utilize private lenders to make and service loans, but they are federally guaranteed.

    To a student loan borrower, the difference in the FFEL and Direct Loan Programs are non-existent. You still need to borrow the money you don’t have and they have the same interest rates to the borrower. The FFEL lenders can offer the same incentives Direct Loans does, like interest rebates for timely payments.

    The difference is that the lenders used in the FFEL Program also get interest and fee payments from the goverment. This is the waste that the House legislation is looking to cut into.

    My problem is, assuming you cut that waste, the government shouldn’t pocket the savings off money paid by borrowers. They should reevaulate the costs of administering the program and tie that to the interest rates charged to the students. Don’t turn it into Pell Grant funds. In my view, the government should fund the Pell program separate from any loan program funds. Otherwise, the student loan borrowers are the ones subsidizing Pell recipients above the level every taxpayer does.

  • yaylie

    There is an overwhelming public interest in subsidizing education, be it through grants, or as the case here is, interest-reduced loans. When America competes against the likes of China and Europe, where education is 100% free, it would be pure folly to let students fend for themselves in the private market for education financing.

    Storlazzi should cut the BS and point to concrete evidence before trying to make questionable allegations that the Direct Loan program has worse customer service than the average private lender. Has Storlazzi ever spoken to Sallie Mae?

  • Yale 08

    I know Economics is hard for you English majors but…

    The government’s intervention in student loans is the CAUSE of the inflation in college tuition.

  • Gubmint

    Ah, lies.

  • Yale ’00

    To everybody complaining about this change, please, please, just keep two basic things in mind:

    (1) Anybody who wants a private loan can still get one — unsubsidized by the government. (Capitalists rejoice!) And lots of people will get them, as always, when the subsidized loans aren’t enough.

    (2) The federal government, instead of “guaranteeing” loans and forking over boatloads of my taxpayer dollars to private loan servicers for doing very little, will simply make the direct loans like they’ve always done — and like they used to do before this stupid experiment in federally guaranteed corporate welfare began.

    So please, please, can we spare the tiny violins about government takeovers and interventions and the “gigantic federal government”? The only change happening right now is a slight reduction in corporate welfare.

  • collegeloanconsultant

    Well, here’s one difference:

    It costs the federal government 97% of the loan amount for defaults on FFELP loans.
    It costs the federal government 100% of the loan amount for defaults on federal Direct student loans.

  • Yale alum ’08

    Well private or not, you have to ask yourself how it is that students in the UK can go to Oxbridge, schools equal to Yale or Harvard, for barely $5,000/year. Should I mention even international students in the UK have full access to the National Health Service? Nah, it just adds insult to injury. Its mind-boggling to me that Americans so easily equate government spending on public goods as “government out of control”, “tyranny”, “socialism” or other dramatic epithets. Spare me your American violins and get with reality: The US, the largest world economy and one of the most industrialized nations on earth can’t provide basic goods invariant of one’s social class or race. Yet the private sphere via corporations have their hand in almost every aspect of the economy and society. So much for your “freedom” and “liberty” America. Your whole social fabric and values are distorted and hypocritical. No wonder we’re the laughing stock of Europe.

  • Pingback: defensive driving academy

  • Pingback: instant payday loans

  • Pingback: North Dighton

  • Pingback: cheap auto insurance online quotes

  • Pingback: cheap car insurance

  • Pingback: berceau bébé