Brief: Paterson rejects Broadwater project, Conn. officials respond favorably

New York Gov. David Paterson rejected Wednesday night the Broadwater project, a controversial liquefied-natural-gas terminal that Broadwater Energy sought to build in the Long Island Sound, the New Haven Register reported on Thursday.

Many Connecticut state officials, such as Gov. M. Jodi Rell, oppose the project because of the potential environmental repercussions. Yesterday, Rell also publicly endorsed federal legislation stripping the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the ability to singularly approve the construction of terminals such as that proposed by the Broadwater project.

The Broadwater terminal is among 23 liquefied-natural-gas-terminals that the FERC has recently approved for placement throughout the country. A barge-like site that would convert liquefied gas into oil, Broadwater would have provided energy to both Connecticut and New York. But, since it would have sat in a section of the Long Island Sound considered to be New York waters — by distance, it would have been about 1 mile closer to New York than to Connecticut — New York had sole power to decide whether the project would go forward.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal told the Register that the rejection is “a huge and historic victory for both sides of the Sound.”

“I can tell you that this plan has been rejected on solid coastal zone criteria that will be upheld if they are challenged, and this decision is on very solid legal ground,” Blumenthal told the Register.

Paterson is expected to officially declare his decision at 2 p.m. today, near the Long Island Sound.

— Samuel Breidbart contributed reporting.


  • Jen

    Great victory , this was a shell pil deal. will never forget that nyc councilmember jim gennarro tried to et a resolution to support this.


    Thank you, thank you, thank you, New York State. Props also to Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal.

  • JHC

    It was supposed to be built right across from the Thimble Islands - the ones bought by that mysterious New York developer and/or Daughter of one.She owns all of them now.Maybe so no-one is left to protest the deal.
    who knows maybe they never gave a crap about it.

  • megan1993

    “Standing on York Street is a citadel of vulgarity that damages Yale night after night. It brings people devoid of class or morality into the heart of our campus and strips normally benign Yale students of their own decency.”……..

    HAHA, are you implying that these “normally benign Yale students” have class and morality? Alex Fisher, have you forgotten the Yale fraternity rape chants? GOD FORBID an innocent Quinnipiac student passed by Yale after a night of dancing and their ears were tainted with the immorality of these “decent” Yale students.

    YALE’S VULGARITY MUST GO. To make this happen, Yale must close — for good.

    In reality though, your argument is flawed in many ways. Get up and do something about your annoyance with indecent students. Don’t whine on Yale Daily.