Laptop users take heed: Noteworthy programs abound

I grew up taking traditional, handwritten notes, most often in outline form. I wrote in cursive and rarely every referred back to these notes, mainly because they were often not as well organized as the textbook, and cursive is hard to scan if you are looking for specific information rather than reading a page of notes in its entirety.

So I switched to taking notes on my laptop a year ago, which has many advantages — but also several downfalls. I am not a terribly disciplined person, and while I almost never surf online during class or section, my method of absorbing a lecture or presentation (especially if I haven’t done the reading) is not tremendously aided by the use of a laptop in class, even if my notes are suddenly a breeze to read or search.

For chemistry and economics, I have found a tablet to be helpful, especially for graphs and their equations: Drawing these on the screen is simply less time-consuming than attempting to be a mouse artist. While I thought my tablet would prove very useful in art history, I found it a bit cumbersome to lug through the gallery. However, in lecture classes with seats, a larger, higher-resolution screen is definitely a plus: I am able to read documents and take notes side by side as a result. For a tight deadline when writing an article or laying out a long presentation, I find a second monitor — perhaps attached at a computer cluster — to be invaluable.

Some of the greatest hurdles, however, come on the software side of the note taker’s experience. While I am coming to appreciate Vista’s improved tablet functionality, I still find errors in OneNote, even in its latest Office 2007 version. Microsoft may refer to OneNote as revolutionary, but I believe one has to look to other products such as MindJet MindManager to find something truly extraordinary. However, I think I would be uncomfortable solely using MindManager to take notes, as the hierarchical “mind-mapping” format is a bit constraining when you don’t know how your professor will structure the remainder of a lecture. Still, it works wonders for brainstorming or outlining a paper’s thesis.

My complaints with OneNote include the inability to properly copy and scale all visual objects, including images, drawings and PDFs. Inevitably, parts of your drawn images or diagrams will detach. While the problem was worse in 2003, and the ability to “add space” to your page helps a great deal, it is still frustrating not to have total control over drawn entities. Perhaps a “grouping” function, as found in Word and the venerable Google SketchUp 3D modeling program, would solve these problems substantially. Because Word already has this feature, my eyes stray toward the MacBooks in class who take notes in Word using the note-taking template. Even though this template may lack some of OneNote’s features, it maintains the more powerful capability of table formatting from Word. For those eager to upgrade to the just-released Office 2008 for Mac, be warned: it still will not include OneNote.

In a more general sense, it seems that the more progressive applications — SketchUp and the latest 2007 incarnation of Office come to mind — include more intuitive user interfaces than in the past. Despite its complexity, SketchUp only has a handful of buttons. The “ribbon” toolbar interface in Office 2007 is obviously an attempt at simplification. The iPod user interface is a perfect example of the ideal these companies are attempting to imitate. Still, they have a long way to go.

The day when users will be able to do a plethora of very advanced tasks on their laptops and cell phones with very little technical knowledge is close at hand; it is also a day I await with great anticipation.

Barrett Williams is a sophomore in Trumbull College. His column appears Wednesdays.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    MindManager is a great program. I have been using it on Tablet PCs to take notes for three years.

    You said However, I think I would be uncomfortable solely using MindManager to take notes, as the hierarchical “mind-mapping” format is a bit constraining when you don’t know how your professor will structure the remainder of a lecture."

    I think this is one of the powers of MindManager compared to mind mapping on paper, that you can rearrange the topics easily by dragging and dropping anywhere else on the map either during the lecture or afterwards in your review.

  • Anonymous

    Another tool worth checking out is comapping.com which has taken mind mapping onto a different level by allowing collaboration with multiple users at the same time.

    The design of comapping is fundamentally different from existing mind mapping applications (such as mind manager) in that it maps left to right as opposed to mapping around a central node. The benefit of such a structure is that the user can scan the infomation in less eye spans. This is coupled together with a unique auto-collapsing algorithm which allows users to focus on infomation that is relevant. In other words, Comapping displays maximum infomation on the screen for those areas that the user is interested in. This really shines through when the size and complexity of the maps increases and the user wants to quickly navigate through the map as opposed to scrolling up and down and left and right.

    Comapping.com is compatible with most standard mind mapping application and can serve as an excellent add-on software for collaboration with multiple users.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for your article. I have used Evernote 2 to capture text, web pages, make to do lists, and it does work with tablets (although I haven't tried).
    Regarding #2 comment, Mind Mapping grew from research showing that people have strong abilities to remember visual information. Is there peer-reviewed research showing that group collaboration is facilitated better with certain mind map structures?

  • Pingback: OaklEy Hijinx SunglaSSES

  • Pingback: iZqjOBkD

  • Pingback: hermes bags

  • Pingback: CHEAP JORDANS

  • Pingback: MULBERRY BAGS

  • Pingback: SACS LOUIS VUITTON