Law students reveal identity of AutoAdmit defendant in new complaint
Agreed. There is no reasonable reason to maintain their anonymity. They are defendants in a case filed in Pennsylvania. Everyone knows the names. This is just playing into the litigation public relations strategy that they have employed.
Ditto. I understand the rationale, but this isn't a rape case, guys.
Trace this? Am I being sarcastic enough to be sued?
Grow up.
Glad that douchebags cannot hide behind cyberspace and malign individuals without repercussions. I hope they sue his/their pants off. The next step: bringing down Juicycampus.
-HD
Funny, I Googled, and I can't find evidence of a single individual with the legal name HD.
#6: Indeed, very interesting that an individual writes anonymously to express disapproval of anonymous Internet speech. One could even think that this is hypocritical.
Once could, couldn't one.
Surely, if I were slandering someone then my actions are reprehensible, and therefore every effort should be made to track me down. I am not opposed to anonymous postings, but am in favor of exposing individuals who malign others (identifying them over the internet).
-HD
If I slander another individual, then I should be held accountable. Every effort should be made to track me down and punish me for my malicious comments---whether by exposing me on the internet with my name and credentials or monetairly. In essence, an analogy can be made to that of the interaction between patient and physician. The physican has to maintain confidentiality, unless the individual will harm someone else (i.e plan to murder someone or not disclose his/her STD status to their partner and continues to have unprotected sex). I feel the same way about internet. A physician has to make the judgement call. :)
-HD
If you're posting his name, you should be posting theirs too.